Sunday, 28 October 2018

2018 IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C


As part of the decision to adopt the Paris Agreement, the IPCC was invited to produce, in 2018, a Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This Report, released in October 2018, has the imposing title:
Global Warming of 1.5 °C: IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty

This Report is important because:
·      This is the first report to be released since the coming into force of the Paris Agreement.
·      Many countries, including India, are already feeling the extreme impact of climate change.

Major Questions Addressed in the Special Report

Why are we talking about 1.5°C?
Climate change represents an urgent and potentially irreversible threat to human societies and the planet. In recognition of this, the overwhelming majority of countries around the world adopted the Paris Agreement in December 2015, the central aim of which includes pursuing efforts to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C.

How close are we to 1.5°C?
Human–induced warming has already reached about 1°C above pre-industrial levels. If the current warming rate continues, the world would reach human–induced global warming of 1.5°C around 2040.

What are the impacts of 1.5°C and 2°C of warming?
The impacts of climate change are being felt in every inhabited continent and in the oceans. But they are not spread uniformly across the globe, and different parts of the world experience impacts differently. An average warming of 1.5°C across the whole globe raises the risk of heatwaves and heavy rainfall events, amongst many other potential impacts. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C can help reduce these risks.

What kind of pathways limit warming to 1.5°C and are we on track?
There is no definitive way to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This Special Report identifies two main conceptual pathways to illustrate different interpretations. One stabilises global temperature at, or just below, 1.5°C. Another sees global temperature temporarily exceed 1.5°C before coming back down. Countries’ pledges to reduce their emissions are currently not in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

What transitions could enable limiting global warming to 1.5°C?
In order to limit warming to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels, the world would need to transform in a number of complex and connected ways. Meeting this challenge would require a rapid escalation in the current scale and pace of change, particularly in the coming decades.

Why is adaptation important in a 1.5°C warmer world?
Adaptation is the adjustment process to current or expected changes in climate and its effects. Even though climate change is a global problem, its impacts are experienced differently across the world. This means that responses are often specific to the local context, and so people in different regions are adapting in different ways. A rise in global temperature from 1°C to 1.5°C, and beyond, increases the need for adaptation.

What are the connections between sustainable development and limiting global warming to 1.5°C?
Sustainable development seeks to meet the needs of people living today without compromising the needs of future generations, while balancing social, economic and environmental considerations. The 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) include targets for eradicating poverty; ensuring health, energy and food security; reducing inequality; protecting ecosystems; pursuing sustainable cities and economies; and a goal for climate action (SDG13). Climate change affects the ability to achieve sustainable development goals and limiting warming to 1.5°C will help meet some sustainable development targets. Pursuing sustainable development will influence emissions, impacts and vulnerabilities. Responses to climate change in the form of adaptation and mitigation will also interact with sustainable development with positive effects, known as synergies, or negative effects, known as trade-offs. Responses to climate change can be planned to maximize synergies and limit trade-offs with sustainable development.

What are the pathways to achieving poverty reduction and reducing inequalities while reaching the 1.5°C world?
There are ways to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Of the pathways that exist, some simultaneously achieve sustainable development. They entail a mix of measures that lower emissions and reduce the impacts of climate change, while contributing to poverty eradication and reducing inequalities. Which pathways are possible and desirable will differ between and within regions and nations. This is due to the fact that development progress to date has been uneven and climate-related risks are unevenly distributed. Flexible governance would be needed to ensure that such pathways are inclusive, fair, and equitable to avoid poor and disadvantaged populations becoming worse off. ‘Climate-Resilient Development Pathways’ (CRDPs) offer possibilities to achieve both equitable and low-carbon futures.


Friday, 26 October 2018

Cleaning up the Ganga: Many Attempts, Poor Results


Dr.G.D.Agrawal, 86, a former Professor of IIT Kanpur, and a pioneering environmental activist, died on October 12, 2018, after a nearly four-month hunger strike that he had undertaken in order to pressure the Indian government to take actions to rejuvenate the Ganga. Before starting his fast, Prof.Agrawal had sent a list of demands to PM Modi: Pass legislation to clean and revive the river, cancel all hydroelectric projects on the upper reaches of the Ganges, ban deforestation and sand mining along the river, and establish an independent body to oversee its management. Why did he sacrifice his life for the Ganga and why so many others have deep feelings for the Ganga?

The Ganga is important for many reasons:
·      It has a religious and mythological significance for millions of Indians.
·      The Ganga Plain is the most densely populated part of India. The River is the main source of water for 480 million people  - for irrigation, industries, and other needs.
·      Ganga is also the most harnessed river of India. There are more than 780 dams in the Ganga Basin, most of them being for irrigation.
·      The hydroelectric power potential of the Ganga Basin is 20,700 MW. The existing and planned hydroelectric schemes together account for only 31% of the assessed potential of the Basin.

·      Transport and tourism: The Ganga River and the Basin are already major tourist attractions, with boating, cruises, etc. The government now has plans to develop shipping as a major economic activity on the River.

The Ganga originates in the Himalayan Gangotri Glacier as the River Bhagirathi. At Dev Prayag, Bhagirathi and Alaknanda join together to become the Ganga. The river then flows for about 2500 km through 11 states and reaches the Bay of Bengal. In spite of its importance, however, the Ganga is in one of the most polluted rivers of India.

What are the causes of the heavy pollution of the Ganga?
·      12 billion litres of sewage flow into the river every day from the 118 cities and towns along the river.
·      More than 50% of the sewage is untreated.
·      More than 750 industries discharge 500 MLD (million litres per day) of effluents into the river, most of it from the pulp and paper sector and tanneries.
·      Human bodies and animal carcasses are dumped into the river.

Major pollution of the river comes from Kanpur, Allahabad, Varanasi, and Patna.

What has been the history of public interest litigation on Ganga pollution?
·      The environmental lawyer M.C.Mehta filed the first suit in the Supreme Court in 1985 on the Ganga pollution issue.
·      The Court issued a number of directives to close polluting factories and build wastewater plants. But the directives were ignored and the river became dirtier all the time.
·      Meanwhile the cases have continued in the Court for three decades.
·      In 2014, the Supreme Court directed the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to deal with litigations on industrial pollution, leaving the apex court to deal with the domestic sewage issue.
·      NGT has been hearing a series of cases on the pollution issue.

What were the actions taken be the previous governments to clean up the Ganga?
·      In 1986, PM Rajiv Gandhi launched the Ganga Action Plan.
·      More than Rs. 50 crores were spent over 14 years to build 83 sewage transport networks and treatment plants. But most of them did not operate well.
·      The government set up the National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA) in 2009 and the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) in 2011.

What action did the government that came to power in 2014 take on this matter?
·      Renamed the Water Ministry as the Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation.
·      Set up the National Ganga Council (replacing NGRBA) with PM as the head several Union Ministers and Chief ministers of the five Ganga Basin states as members.
·      Formed State Ganga Committees as nodal agencies.
·      Planned to establish a Ganga EcoTask Force to spread awareness about pollution and protecting the river.
·      Asked seven IITs to work on the best strategies to clean up the river, resulting in the Ganga Rejuvenation Basin Management Programme (GRBMP)
·      Launched the programme Namami Gange in May 2015, for treating municipal waste, managing industrial discharge, enforcing river regulatory zones, and restoring wetlands.
·      Allocated Rs.20,000 crore for Ganga rejuvenation until 2019.
·      Set up the Clean Ganga Fund and declared 100% tax relief for donations for the Clean Ganga projects.
·      Decided to set up a company for implementation of river cleaning projects under the Public-Private Partnership mode, which will eventually construct and operationalize sewage treatment plants in all 118 towns and cities.

What are the main features of the GRBMP?
Restoring the wholesomeness of the river:
  • Aviral Dhara – continuous flow
  • Nirmal Dhara – unpolluted flow
  • Ecological and geological integrity

Integrated Ganga Conservation Mission:
  • Bringing multiple agencies under one roof.
  • Ganga and its tributaries brought under one umbrella for a comprehensive approach
  • Action Plan developed by consortium of seven IITs

Key interventions of immediate action to include:
  • Rehabilitation and upgradation of existing Sewage Treatment Plants
  • Sewerage infrastructure
  • Industrial pollution abatement
  
Why does the Ganga Remain Dirty?
A report published by the Centre for Science and Environment in October 2018, presents the reasons why the Ganga remains dirty:

Sewage treatment and industrial discharge
·      Faulty design and poor performance of existing Sewage treatment Plants (STPs)
·      Delays and cost overruns in setting up new STPs
·      Underestimation of discharge into the sewage system
·      Excessive discharge of effluents by industries, especially tanneries, into drains and sewage lines.
·      Industries not transferring waste to the Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs).

Restoring the river flow for self-purification
·      Not enough water in the Ganga during the non-monsoon months.
·      More than 40 (existing and under-construction) hydroelectric projects turning the upper stretch into an ecological desert.

Sludge control
·      Large number of twin-pit toilets built in the villages on the banks under Swachch Bharat Abhiyan, but no proper management of faecal sludge, leading to high coliform levels in the river.
·      Solid waste dumped on streets reach the river through drains.

Cost overruns and fund use
·      Costs of sewage treatment have escalated due to delays.
·      Poor utilization of available funds for projects, yet high spending on advertisements.

Poor governance
·      Lack of coordination among multiple agencies and ministries involved.
·      Not a single meeting of the National Ganga Council held since its formation.
·      Constant change in the headship of National Mission for Clean Ganga, no continuity in policies or actions.
·      Highly centralised approach without involving people living in the Ganga Basin.

Where is the clean and holy Ganga?