Wednesday, 29 August 2018

Reasons for the Kerala Floods of 2018




I am deeply distressed as I write this blog: Uttarakhand in 2013, Chennai in 2015 and now Kerala – nature’s fury made much worse by human folly! Such disasters will continue and we will not learn any lessons, nor take preventive actions.

Even though your primary purpose is to do well in the Civil Services Examination, please remember that the changing climate is already affecting all of us. Whether you make it to the Civil Service or not, become an eco-warrior!


Why did the Kerala floods occur and why have they caused so much damage?

There are multiple and interconnected reasons for the disaster:
1.   Extreme rainfall over a short period.
2.   Human settlements on the floodplains of rivers.
3.   Deforestation and developmental activities on the Western Ghats.
4.   Building multiple dams and unscientific method of opening the sluice gates during heavy rain.

1.   Extreme Rainfall over a short period
During the first two weeks of August 2018, Kerala received three times the amount of rain it normally gets at this time of the year. Two districts alone, Idukki and Wayanad, received almost as much rain as the normal rainfall that the entire state gets during this time.

Can we attribute the extreme rainfall to global warming and climate change? It is clear that the observed frequency, intensity, and duration of some extreme weather events have been changing as the climate system has warmed. Global warming has led to:
·      An increase in the likelihood of extremely hot days and nights
·      More evaporation that may exacerbate droughts and increased atmospheric moisture that can increase the frequency of heavy rainfall and snowfall events.

However, the extent to which climate change influences an individual weather event (such as the Kerala rainfall) is more difficult to determine. Right now, we can say that extreme weather events are becoming more common across the world and it is reasonable to connect this phenomenon to global warming.

2.   Human settlements on floodplains of rivers
The floodplains on either side of rivers are exactly what the term suggests: a buffer zone which absorbs flood waters. In the past, floodplains were used for growing crops at the right time. In recent decades, however, given the population growth and development pressures, illegal construction on floodplains has been rampant and Kerala is no exception. During the August floods, the buildings on the floodplains were the first to go.

3.   Deforestation and developmental activities on the Western Ghats
While the Western Ghats block the clouds and cause rain, the forests on the Ghats also absorb lot of water and release it slowly. Given the destruction of the forests, the water now just flows away into the narrow strip of Kerala’s land. Further, the flow also causes landslides on the treeless slopes. In addition to deforestation, rampant and unregulated development has been destroying the ecology of the Western Ghats.

In 2010-11, two successive committees (headed by Madhav Gadgil and Kasturirangan, respectively) recommended the declaration of an Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESA) for the Western Ghats. The recommendations also included a ban on mining, quarrying, new dams, and all polluting industries in the ESA. Unfortunately, all the concerned states (Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Goa) opposed the establishment of the ESA and the recommendations were never implemented. Karnataka is against the very idea of ESA, while the other five states have raised questions about the demarcation of ESA and the specification of prohibited activities.

4.   Building and mismanaging multiple dams
It is not often realised that dams could be very dangerous, especially in the current context of climate change and extreme rainfall events. In addition to several problems posed by dams (human displacement, destruction of biodiversity, etc), our reservoirs are not managed scientifically. In 2015, Chennai was flooded because three reservoirs were opened at the same time.

In Kerala, there are 42 large dams and it is said that the sudden opening of many dams caused flooding of rivers. How much water should be let out and when? In order to answer these questions, the reservoir managers have to consider many factors: need for hydro power and irrigation water, forecast of rains yet to come, potential for floods, etc. There is as yet no proper decision-support system available to dam managers.

All these four aspects have to be considered for avoiding or mitigating disasters. Beyond rescue and rehabilitation, we need to plan ecological reconstruction and conservation.

Tuesday, 28 August 2018

Study on Indian Cities and Clean Transportation


What was the Study?
The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), New Delhi, released a study, which examines questions such as:
·      How are some cities, which hold sizeable shares of India’s urban population, positioned in the race for clean and low carbon mobility?
·      Which cities pollute and guzzle more than the others from only urban commute?
·      What is influencing the difference? 

The vehicle population is exploding in Indian cities. It took 60 years – from 1952 to 2008 – for the number of registered vehicles in the country to cross 100 million. But that figure had doubled by 2015. At the same time, the share of public transport in overall transportation modes is expected to decrease from 75.5% in 2000-01 to 44.7% in 2030-31. 

The study assessed 14 cities to understand how the urban commute – the way people travel in cities – contributed to air pollution and energy consumption. The study ranks the cities on the basis of emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide and toxic pollutants like particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, as well as energy guzzling from urban commuting. 

What are the key findings?
  • Bhopal tops for lowest overall emissions and energy use from urban commute
  • Kolkata and Mumbai emit least among six megacities due to high usage of public transport and walking; Kolkata also has short travel distances due to its compact form.
  • Delhi, despite being the third highest for high share of public transport trips, is at the bottom as overall emissions and fuel use are highest due to the sheer number of people, high volume of travel and personal vehicles, and long trip-distances.
  • Megacities of Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Chennai show poor scores. They have lower share of public transport compared to Delhi and yet have scored better than Delhi only because of total travel volumes are comparatively lower given their population levels. With growth and without adequate action they could get worse in future.
  • Though metropolitan cities have scored better than megacities due to lower population, lower travel volume and vehicle numbers, they are at risk due to much higher share of personal vehicle trips and high growth rate
·       Increase in greenhouse gas emissions from transport sector is highest among all the sectors in India. Urban traffic is also the source of very high health-damaging toxic emissions. 

What is the ranking of the 14 cities?
The rankings are given below, with the best one first.
  
Overall emissions and energy consumption:
  1. Bhopal
  2. Vijayawada
  3. Chandigarh
  4. Lucknow
  5. Kochi
  6. Jaipur
  7. Kolkata
  8. Ahmedabad
  9. Pune
  10. Mumbai
  11. Hyderabad
  12. Bengaluru
  13. Chennai
  14. Delhi 

Per-travel trip emissions and energy consumption
  1. Kolkata
  2. Mumbai
  3. Bhopal
  4. Delhi
  5. Ahmedabad
  6. Lucknow
  7. Vijayawada
  8. Pune
  9. Jaipur
  10. Chennai
  11. Bengaluru
  12. Kochi
  13. Chandigarh
  14. Hyderabad 

What should be done?
According to CSE, the study proves that for clean and low carbon mobility, cities need policies to:
·       stop urban sprawl
·       reduce distances between residence, jobs and recreation through compact urban forms
·       scale up integrated public transport, walking and cycling
·       put restraints on use of personal vehicles to avert pollution and climate crisis.